Gonzaga, Grams. C., Haselton, M. G., Smurda, J., Davies, M. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Development and you will People Behavior, 29(2), 119–126.
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Meters. (2000). The place out-of connection for the person mating. Post on Standard Therapy, 4(2), 186–204.
Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, Good. (2002). Websites paradox reviewed. Journal regarding Public Circumstances, 58(1), 49–74.
Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Sites paradox: A personal tech you to decrease public wedding and you will mental really-are? Western Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kreider, Roentgen.M., & Areas, J. M. (2001). Matter, time, and you can time of marriage ceremonies and you may divorces. Current Society Profile, 70-80, (Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, 2005).
Lemieux, R., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional research of closeness, hobbies, and you may commitment: Testing new assumptions of your own triangular principle off love. Mental Records, 90(3,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.90.3.1009-1014
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, E. (2004). Feeling better throughout the doing bad: Personal contrasting within romantic dating. Journal of Identification and you will Social Therapy, 87(1), 80–95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A great., & Gailliot, Yards. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: The implicit knowledge of intimate competition. Diary out of Identification and you can Social Mindset, 97(1), 74–87.
Good. (2001)mitment and you can relationships restoration elements
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A good., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2008). Automatic inattention to glamorous possibilities: The developed therapy of dating fix. Evolution and you will Human Choices, 29(5), 343–349.
pold, B. E. (1981). Sequential data away from disagreement and you may accord during the disappointed and you can nondistressed relationship people. Record regarding Consulting and you can Systematic Therapy, 49(4), 554–567.
McKenna, K. Y. Good., Environmentally friendly, A good. S., Gleason, M. J. (2002). Matchmaking development on the web: What is the larger appeal? Diary away from Personal Issues, 58(1), 9–31.
The great benefits of positive illusions: Idealization while the structure away from pleasure within the romantic relationships
Neff, L. An effective., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Self-assessment objectives when you look at the personal relationship: A model of globally improvement and you may certain verification. Into the P. Noller & J. A great. Feeney (Eds.), Understanding ents throughout the study of partners telecommunications (pp. 32–58). New york, NY: Cambridge College Force.
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The introduction of the consumer-counselor thread from lens from attachment principle. Psychotherapy: Concept, Look, Practice, Knowledge, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The brand new personal monitoring system: Enhanced sensitivity so you’re able to societal signs just like the a transformative reaction to societal difference. For the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The societal outcast: Ostracism, social exemption, getting rejected, and you can intimidation (pp. 213–226). Ny, NY: Psychology Force.
Pierce, T., & Lydon, J. Elizabeth. (2001). Around the world and you will specific relational models on exposure to public relations. Record regarding Personality and Social Psychology, 80(4), 613–631 brightwomen.net kig pГҐ weblinket.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A beneficial., Tran, S., ). Attachment and you can advice seeking during the intimate relationships. Identity and you can Societal Therapy Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.
Ross, L. R., & Spinner, B. (2001). General and you will specific accessory representations when you look at the adulthood: Is there a love?. Diary Out-of Societal And personal Dating, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. Age., Olsen, Letter., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. In J. Harvey & A. Wenzel (Eds.), Intimate romantic dating: Maintenance and you will improvement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, An excellent. D. (2000). Projection actually impression certainly one of spouses since the a purpose of the brand new similarity within shared skills. Identity And you may Personal Therapy Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, Yards. P. (1980). Outcomes of salience regarding extrinsic advantages toward taste and enjoying. Record of Identity and you can Societal Mindset, 38(3), 453–460.